From 1 - 10 / 91
  • Spatial estimates of the mean percentage of incoming wave height reaching areas of marsh and the standard deviation of those values are provided as raster layers (ED_to_MeanPercWave_30m1.tif and ED_to_SDPercWave_30m1.tif). The products represent a simplified model for the relationship between distance from the edge of a marsh parcel and the effect of the marsh surface on wave heights. Values are changes in wave heights expressed as percentages of the incident wave height at the marsh edge. To support this model X-beach was run in 1D transect mode over idealised bathymetry and vegetation extents. Water levels, incident wave heights and cross-shore slopes were varied to represent the variety of such conditions expected across the domain. Vegetation representations in the model were taken from field data collected at Tillingham, UK, while the Cd term was calibrated against wave measurements made at Hellegat, NL. Model configuration was largely the same as that used for the EUFAST educational version except that the grid was refined to 5m cells to allow resolution of changes even within narrow fringing marshes. Parameter values (see X-Beach documentation for definitions) used are summarised in the table below: Parameter Value(s) Wavecon (wave heights Hm0) 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 WaveconS (steepness H/L) 7, 15, 30 waterLevelCon (above MSL) 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 Coastalslopecon (1/n) 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000 Dir0 270 m 100 taper 0.01 wavint 30 gamma 0.5 nsec 1 ah 0.3 bv 0.00125 N 1125 Cd 0.19 Exhaustive combination of parameters resulted in 2310 model runs. From each run the significant wave height was extracted at distances along the vegetated transect (every 5 metres up to 100m, then at 250, 500, 1000 and 2000m). The effect of vegetation on significant wave height with distance (and its variance resulting from different topographic and hydrodynamics conditions) was then characterised by calculating the percentage of incoming wave height (Hm0) remaining at each distance interval. The mean and standard deviations for the percentage wave height remaining at each interval were then calculated. Two-term exponential functions were fitted to describe the variation with distance of the mean percentage wave height and the mean plus one standard deviation. The functions, where x is the distance along the vegetated transect, take the form: PercHsRemaining=a*exp(b*x) + c*exp(d*x) Coefficient values and goodness of fit are reported below. Function a b c d R-square Adj. R-square RMSE SSE Mean 28.6049 -0.0576 69.9979 -0.00183 0.9969 0.9965 1.259 33.31 Mean+1Sigma 9.8323 -0.1053 90.6793 -0.00093 0.9973 0.9969 1.046 22.96 Figure 1: Aggregated results of XBeach runs represented as percentage of incoming wave height remaining with distance along a vegetated transect. Exponential functions fitted to data are also shown. The UK Environment Agency saltmarsh extents layer (Phelan, 2011) was generalised to exclude small creeks and pools using a 10m outer buffer followed by dissolving overlapping features and buffering inwards by 10m. Landward margins of marsh parcels were removed by deleting any lines that intersected a 10m buffer from the UK Shoreline Management Plan vector layer, which typically describes the location of the sea wall or other line of defence. The resulting layer was then used to calculate a surface based on Euclidean distance of the cell centroid to the nearest margin of a marsh parcel. The analysis was conducted on a 30m grid. The exponential functions derived from the X-Beach modelling were applied to the 30m Euclidean distance surface to generate maps of mean percentage of incoming wave height and the standard deviation of that value at each cell. No attempt is made to model the spatial variability in incoming wave heights across the entire domain. The products supplied are Mean residual wave percentage and standard deviation of residual wave percentage. The script used to generate these results is FAST_MorphoChange_WaveAtten.py.

  • A Copernicus Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract NDVI. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • A Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract Leaf Area Index (LAI), with the proviso that NDVI is larger than 0.3 to include marsh only. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • A Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract Leaf Area Index (LAI), with the proviso that NDVI is larger than 0.3 to include marsh only. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • A Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract Leaf Area Index (LAI), with the proviso that NDVI is larger than 0.3 to include marsh only. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • A Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract Leaf Area Index (LAI), with the proviso that NDVI is larger than 0.3 to include marsh only. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • A Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract Leaf Area Index (LAI), with the proviso that NDVI is larger than 0.3 to include marsh only. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • Coastal digital terrain model's (DTMs) are a critial component of MiSAFE. They are the geospatial data over which all wave propagation calculations are made and may form an important component of classification schemes; by defining elevation ranges over which different types of intertidal vegetation occur. EU/ESA's Copernicus, high resolution Sentinels (S1 and S2) and the NASA/USGS Landsat missions can potentially help create inter-tidal elevation maps. Elevation maps were developed using the Google Earth Maps. If you have any questions concerning the data, please contact Edward Morris.

  • A Copernicus Sentinel-2 image was atmospherically corrected using Sen2Cor in SNAP 4, and then used to extract NDVI. Dike line was used to mask any area outside of the intertidal and subtidal zone. Coordinate system: WGS_84_UTM. Attribution: This product is developed by NIOZ for EU FAST project (Foreshore Assessment Using Space Technology). Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2015/2016). See also https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/690755/Sentinel_Data_Legal_Notice

  • Simulation is a non-hydrostatic XBeach-VEG simulation with and without vegetation. For more information about the possibilities of XBeach-VEG see https://publicwiki.deltares.nl/display/VegMod/XBeach-VEG